JAHNKE ROAD COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
New Directions Survey Analysis
Cary Weatherford
January 1998
Introduction
In all 263 people responded to the survey. Some
of these responses were only partial and this will be reflected in the final results. Some
individuals chose to answer only certain questions for emphasis while others omitted some
questions for personal reasons or failed to recognize that the form was two-sided. The
following is an analysis of the responses beginning witha general profile of the
demographic characteristics followed by a breakdown of the more comprehensive questions.
Table of
Survey Contents
Demographics
Question 10 revealed that a large majority of the questionnaires
were received from females more than double the number received from males. A total of 253
people answered this question 177 or 70% were females and 76 or 30% were males.
Age
Table I below illustrates the age representation of the
questionnaire respondents. The group most largely represented are those 61 and over with a
total of 83 or 33% of the 252 individuals who answered this question. Second is the 31 to
40 age group at 52 or 21%. The group with the smallest representation is 19 and under
group.
| Age |
# of Responses |
% of Responses |
| 19 and Under |
8 |
3% |
| 20 to 30 |
37 |
15% |
| 31 to 40 |
52 |
21% |
| 41 to 50 |
46 |
18% |
| 51 to 60 |
2.60 |
10% |
| 61 and over |
83 |
33% |
| |
| Total |
252 |
100% |
Table l: Age
Representation
Top
Income
Table 2 below shows the breakdown of the income levels of the
participants as taken from responses to Question 13. Representation among the 210 people
who answered this question appears to be evenly distributed among the various income
ranges. The highest number comes from $40,000 to $50,000 income bracket with a total of 29
or 14% of the responses. The $35,000 to $40,000 and $25,000 to $30,000 ranges are close
behind with 26 (12%) and 25 (12%) respectively. The range least represented is the under
$10,000 range.
Income Range
|
# of Responses |
% of Responses |
Up to $10,000
|
11 |
5% |
$10 001 to $15,000
|
13 |
6% |
$15 001 to $20,000
|
14 |
7% |
$20 001 to $25,000
|
18 |
9% |
$25 001 to $30,000
|
25 |
12% |
$30 001 to $35,000
|
21 |
10% |
$35 001 to $40,000
|
26 |
12% |
$40 001 to $50,000
|
29 |
14% |
$50 001 to $60,000
|
21 |
10% |
$60 001 to $70,000
|
12 |
6% |
over $70,000
|
20 |
10% |
| |
Total
|
210 |
100% |
Table 2: Income
Representation
Top
Household
Size
Table 3 shows the size of households which were
represented in the survey. A large majority of households surveyed (80%) had two or fewer
members with two member households being the most common.
| Household Size |
# of Responses |
% of Responses |
| 1 |
99 |
40% |
| 2 |
100 |
40% |
| 3 |
21 |
8% |
| 4 |
17 |
7% |
| 5 |
9 |
4% |
| 6 |
3 |
1% |
| |
| Total |
249 |
100% |
Table 3: Household
Size
Top
Pets
In Question 15 respondents were asked the number of pets they had in their household.
These answers are contained in Table 4 below. Of the 254 who answered this question 148 or
58% do not have any pets. The remainder have at least one pet a majority of which are one
or two pet households. However 13 households (5%) said they have 5 pets.
Pets in Household
Number of Pets |
#
of Responses |
%
of Responses |
0 |
148 |
58% |
1 |
42 |
17% |
2 |
25 |
10% |
3 |
18 |
7% |
4 |
8 |
3% |
5 |
13 |
5% |
| |
Total |
254 |
100% |
Table 4: Number of
Pets in Household
In the second part of Question 15,
households with pets were asked to clarify what type of pet or pets theyhave. A large
majority of pet owners have cats and dogs, which totaled 90 (46%) and 67 (34%)
respectively. Of the pet types remaining on the questionnaire, 8% of pet owners have
birds, 10% fish, and 2% reptiles. Some others not contained on the list which were
mentioned are hamsters, rabbits, gerbils, and sugar gliders.
Type of Pets
| Type |
# of Responses |
% of Responses |
Bird |
15 |
8% |
Cat |
90 |
46% |
Dog |
67 |
34% |
Fish |
20 |
10% |
Reptile |
3 |
2% |
| |
Total |
195 |
100% |
Table 5: Types of Pets
Top
Neighborhood/
Subdivision/ Apartment Complex
In Question 12, respondents were asked
to specify neighborhood/ subdivision/ apartment complex they live, the street they live
on, and the zip code in which they live.
Most of the survey participants come
from the 23225 zip code area.
Of the 174 persons who offered their
zip code, 167 or 96% live in 23225 area.
Of the remainder,
3 live in 23224, and
1 each in 23221, 23231, 23223 and 23226.
Street name and neighborhood were
more diverse, though some answers appeared somewhat frequently.
Heritage Oaks
Westlake Hills
Westover Gardens
Bramblewood Estates
Renaissance, and
Oakhurst Manor
were frequently mentioned as area of residence.
Street of residence was the most
diverse, but
Hioaks Road
German School Road
Forest Hill Avenue
Jahnke Road
Newell Road
were frequently mentioned.
Top
Shopping Habits/Patterns
Question I asked respondents to indicate where they shop most often. Table 6 below
displays the results. The Food Lion Center is overwhelmingly the most popular area to
shop, followed by Cloverleaf Mall, Chesterfield Town Center, the Midlothian Corridor, and
Stony Point Shopping Center. Downtown and Westover were the choices mentioned least. Some
of the areas mentioned which were not on the list are Brook Run, Hannaford, Regency,
Ukrops on Midlothian, and Sam's Club.
Shopping
Preferences
Area |
# of Responses |
Rank |
Food Lion Center |
128 |
1 |
Cloverleaf |
77 |
2 |
Chesterfield Town Ctr. |
73 |
3 |
Midlothian Corridor |
59 |
4 |
Stony Point Shopping |
50 |
5 |
Stratford Hills |
45 |
6 |
Bon Air District |
25 |
7 |
Parkway Shopping Ctr. |
23 |
8 |
Willow Lawn |
15 |
9 |
Southside Plaza |
13 |
10 |
Downtown |
4 |
11 |
Westover |
3 |
12 |
Table 6: Current
Shopping Preferences
Top
Impressions Of The Jahnke Road Corridor
Question 12 examines parking in the
Jahnke Road corridor. Most individuals who answered this question felt that parking was
adequate. Of 231,193 or 84% indicated this, while only 38 or 16% felt parking was not
adequate.
In Question 6 they were asked to
chose, from a number of factors, which elements of the area discourage them from shopping
there. The question was designed for respondents to choose the five most discouraging
factors, and to rank then 1 to 5. However, most ofthe individuals who answered this
question did not follow this format. Some put a number beside every choice, while others
simply checked the most discouraging factors. For this reason, all of the choices for each
factor were totaled instead of examining the emphasis placed on each by assigning it a
number.
Table 8 below lists the results. The
three most discouraging factors were crime in the area, visual appearance, and the current
mix of businesses. The three elements which received the least notice are public
transportation, parking, and street congestion though all three were selected more than 25
times.
Discouraging
Factors
| Factors |
# of Responses |
Rank |
| Crime in Area |
116 |
1 |
| Visual Appearance |
107 |
2 |
| Current Mix Of Businesses |
94 |
3 |
| Loitering |
90 |
4 |
| Litter/Trash in Area |
89 |
5 |
| Street/Outside Security |
88 |
6 |
| Alcohol/Drug Use Outside |
72 |
7 |
| Juvenile Gangs |
70 |
8 |
| Street Traffic Flow |
64 |
9 |
| Congested Streets |
46 |
10 |
| lnadequate Parking |
35 |
11 |
| Public Transportation |
29 |
12 |
Table 8: Discouraging Factors
Questions 8 and 9, both open-ended, attempted to pinpoint the most and least attractive
elements of the Jahnke Road corridor. Because of their number and diversity, these answers
are difficult to categorize and quantify. They have, however, been transcribed verbatim
and are provided in the data packet which accompanies the report.
Top
Improvements
and Services Needed
Question 3 gave survey respondents the chance to choose which services they would like to
see in the Jahnke Road corridor. Table 9 below list the goods and services in the order of
their popularity. The top five responses were restaurants, a hardware store, a grocery
store, a bakery, and a women's clothing store. The five goods or services which were
selected the least were financial services, appliances, professional services, furniture
store, and medical services.
Desired Goods and Services
Goods/Service |
# of Responses |
Rank |
Restaurants |
147 |
1 |
Hardware Store |
105 |
2 |
Grocery Store |
95 |
3 |
Bakery |
94 |
4 |
Clothing-Women |
80 |
5 |
Florist |
67 |
6 |
Shoe Store |
61 |
7 |
Drug Store |
53 |
8 |
Barber/Beauty Shop |
51 |
9 |
Dry Cleaning |
49 |
10 |
Sporting Goods |
42 |
11 |
Clothing-Men |
42 |
12 |
Clothing-Child |
42 |
13 |
Medical Services |
39 |
14 |
Furniture Store |
28 |
15 |
Professional Services |
27 |
16 |
Appliances |
25 |
17 |
Financial Service |
21 |
18 |
Table 9: Desired Goods
and Services
Top
In conjunction with the responses given
for Questions 7 and 8, Question 4 allowed survey participants to choose which improvements
they deemed most important for the Jahnke Road Corridor. Table 10 below lists the
improvements in order of their popularity.
| Improvement |
# of Responses
|
Rank |
Public Safety |
140 |
1 |
Lighting |
96 |
2 |
Variety of Merchandise |
92 |
3 |
Quality of Service |
80 |
4 |
Walkways |
75 |
5 |
Access |
56 |
6 |
Advertising |
49 |
7 |
Prices |
46 |
8 |
Special Promotions |
36 |
9 |
Window Displays |
34 |
10 |
Store Hours |
31 |
11 |
Store Interiors |
29 |
12 |
Table 10: Needed
Improvements
The improvement which was declared most
important was the need to increase public safety, which got 44 more responses than the
number two selection. The remaining responses in the top five in order of popularity were
lighting, the variety of merchandise, quality of service, and walkways.
Top
Activities
In Question 16, a number of leisure activities which are performed outside the
home were listed. Individuals were to chose the three they participate in most, and to
order them from 1 for most frequent to 3 for least frequent. Once again, many of the
answers did not conform to the format of the question, so all of the responses for each
activity were simply totaled. Religious and church related activities and walking were
tied for the most popular activity, followed by movies, natural walks, and other
activities which were not listed.
| Activity |
# of Responses |
Rank |
| Religious |
129 |
1 |
| Walking |
129 |
2 |
| Movies |
92 |
3 |
| Natural Walks |
67 |
4 |
| Others |
52 |
5 |
| Swimming |
35 |
6 |
| Automotive |
28 |
7 |
| Bicycling |
25 |
8 |
| Bowling |
24 |
9 |
| Dancing |
22 |
10 |
| Water Sports |
21 |
11 |
| Golf |
21 |
12 |
| Tennis |
18 |
13 |
| Baseball |
16 |
14 |
| Basketball |
14 |
15 |
| Volleyball |
9 |
16 |
| Soccer |
8 |
17 |
| Rink Skating |
6 |
18 |
| Roller Blading |
5 |
19 |
Table 11: Activities
Outside of Home
Top
Question 17 focused on activities which
take place at home. Survey participants were given a choice of 11 such activities, and
asked to choose their three favorites, ranking them from 1 to 3. The results are furnished
below in Table 12. Reading or books was the overwhelming favorite, with 178 responses.
Completing the top five are video, cooking/culinary, yard or lawn care, and gardening.
At Home Activities
Activity |
# of Responses |
Rank |
Reading/Books |
178 |
1 |
Video |
99 |
2 |
Cooking/Culinary |
76 |
3 |
Lawn/Yard Care |
52 |
4 |
Gardening |
47 |
5 |
Computer Related |
46 |
6 |
Crafts |
41 |
7 |
Pet Related |
40 |
8 |
Photography |
24 |
9 |
Painting/Framing |
19 |
10 |
Spa/Pool/Hot Tub |
11 |
11 |
Table 12: At Home
Activities
Question 18 allowed respondents a
chance to suggest a recreational activity they would most like to see in the Jahnke Road
Corridor. These answers are included in the data packet which accompanies this report.
This question prompted a variety of answers too numerous to mention in this report. There
were, however, several responses which appeared repeatedly. A fitness facility or gym of
some kind appeared several times, as did a skate rink, bowling alley, park, movie theater,
and walking trail.
Top
|