JAHNKE
ROADCOMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
ASSOCIATION
Richmond, VA

HOME
NEWS
CALENDAR
COMMUNITIES
COMMERCE
MASTER PLAN
STATISTICS
DIRECTORY

LINKS

SAFETY TIPS
SEARCH
CONTACT
ABOUT ...

You are visitor no.
Hit Counter
since 8 March 1999

Community Survey

JAHNKE ROAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
New Directions Survey Analysis
Cary Weatherford
January 1998

Introduction
In all 263 people responded to the survey. Some of these responses were only partial and this will be reflected in the final results. Some individuals chose to answer only certain questions for emphasis while others omitted some questions for personal reasons or failed to recognize that the form was two-sided. The following is an analysis of the responses beginning witha general profile of the demographic characteristics followed by a breakdown of the more comprehensive questions.

Table of Survey Contents


Demographics
Question 10 revealed that a large majority of the questionnaires were received from females more than double the number received from males. A total of 253 people answered this question 177 or 70% were females and 76 or 30% were males.


Age
Table I below illustrates the age representation of the questionnaire respondents. The group most largely represented are those 61 and over with a total of 83 or 33% of the 252 individuals who answered this question. Second is the 31 to 40 age group at 52 or 21%. The group with the smallest representation is 19 and under group.

Age # of Responses % of Responses
19 and Under

8

3%

20 to 30

37

15%

31 to 40

52

21%

41 to 50

46

18%

51 to 60

2.60

10%

61 and over

83

33%

 
Total

252

100%

Table l: Age Representation

Top                        


Income
Table 2 below shows the breakdown of the income levels of the participants as taken from responses to Question 13. Representation among the 210 people who answered this question appears to be evenly distributed among the various income ranges. The highest number comes from $40,000 to $50,000 income bracket with a total of 29 or 14% of the responses. The $35,000 to $40,000 and $25,000 to $30,000 ranges are close behind with 26 (12%) and 25 (12%) respectively. The range least represented is the under $10,000 range.

Income Range      
# of Responses % of Responses
Up to $10,000
11 5%
$10 001 to $15,000  
13 6%
$15 001 to $20,000   
14 7%
$20 001 to $25,000   
18 9%
$25 001 to $30,000    
25 12%
$30 001 to $35,000    
21 10%
$35 001 to $40,000    
26 12%
$40 001 to $50,000   
29 14%
$50 001 to $60,000    
21 10%
$60 001 to $70,000    
12 6%
over $70,000     
20 10%
 
Total        
210 100%

Table 2: Income Representation

Top                        


Household Size
Table 3 shows the size of households which were represented in the survey. A large majority of households surveyed (80%) had two or fewer members with two member households being the most common.

Household Size # of Responses % of Responses
1 99 40%
2 100 40%
3 21 8%
4 17 7%
5 9 4%
6 3 1%
 
Total 249 100%

Table 3: Household Size

Top                        


Pets
In Question 15 respondents were asked the number of pets they had in their household. These answers are contained in Table 4 below. Of the 254 who answered this question 148 or 58% do not have any pets. The remainder have at least one pet a majority of which are one or two pet households. However 13 households (5%) said they have 5 pets.

Pets in Household

Number of Pets

# of Responses

% of Responses

0

148

58%

1

42

17%

2

25

10%

3

18

7%

4

8

3%

5

13

5%

 

Total

254

100%

Table 4: Number of Pets in Household

In the second part of Question 15, households with pets were asked to clarify what type of pet or pets theyhave. A large majority of pet owners have cats and dogs, which totaled 90 (46%) and 67 (34%) respectively. Of the pet types remaining on the questionnaire, 8% of pet owners have birds, 10% fish, and 2% reptiles. Some others not contained on the list which were mentioned are hamsters, rabbits, gerbils, and sugar gliders.

Type of Pets

Type # of Responses % of Responses

Bird

15

8%

Cat

90

46%

Dog

67

34%

Fish

20

10%

Reptile

3

2%

 

Total

195

100%

Table 5: Types of Pets

Top                        


Neighborhood/ Subdivision/ Apartment Complex

In Question 12, respondents were asked to specify neighborhood/ subdivision/ apartment complex they live, the street they live on, and the zip code in which they live.

  • Most of the survey participants come from the 23225 zip code area.

  • Of the 174 persons who offered their zip code, 167 or 96% live in 23225 area.

  • Of the remainder,
    3 live in 23224, and
    1 each in 23221, 23231, 23223 and 23226.

  • Street name and neighborhood were more diverse, though some answers appeared somewhat frequently.
    Heritage Oaks
    Westlake Hills
    Westover Gardens
    Bramblewood Estates
    Renaissance, and
    Oakhurst Manor
    were frequently mentioned as area of residence.

  • Street of residence was the most diverse, but
    Hioaks Road
    German School Road
    Forest Hill Avenue
    Jahnke Road
    Newell Road
    were frequently mentioned.

    Top                        


Shopping Habits/Patterns

Question I asked respondents to indicate where they shop most often. Table 6 below displays the results. The Food Lion Center is overwhelmingly the most popular area to shop, followed by Cloverleaf Mall, Chesterfield Town Center, the Midlothian Corridor, and Stony Point Shopping Center. Downtown and Westover were the choices mentioned least. Some of the areas mentioned which were not on the list are Brook Run, Hannaford, Regency, Ukrops on Midlothian, and Sam's Club.

Shopping Preferences

Area

# of Responses

Rank

Food Lion Center

128

1

Cloverleaf

77

2

Chesterfield Town Ctr.

73

3

Midlothian Corridor

59

4

Stony Point Shopping

50

5

Stratford Hills

45

6

Bon Air District

25

7

Parkway Shopping Ctr.

23

8

Willow Lawn

15

9

Southside Plaza

13

10

Downtown

4

11

Westover

3

12

Table 6: Current Shopping Preferences

Top                        


Impressions Of The Jahnke Road Corridor

  • Question 12 examines parking in the Jahnke Road corridor. Most individuals who answered this question felt that parking was adequate. Of 231,193 or 84% indicated this, while only 38 or 16% felt parking was not adequate.

  • In Question 6 they were asked to chose, from a number of factors, which elements of the area discourage them from shopping there. The question was designed for respondents to choose the five most discouraging factors, and to rank then 1 to 5. However, most ofthe individuals who answered this question did not follow this format. Some put a number beside every choice, while others simply checked the most discouraging factors. For this reason, all of the choices for each factor were totaled instead of examining the emphasis placed on each by assigning it a number.

  • Table 8 below lists the results. The three most discouraging factors were crime in the area, visual appearance, and the current mix of businesses. The three elements which received the least notice are public transportation, parking, and street congestion though all three were selected more than 25 times.


    Discouraging Factors

    Factors

    # of Responses

    Rank

    Crime in Area 116 1
    Visual Appearance 107 2
    Current Mix Of Businesses 94 3
    Loitering 90 4
    Litter/Trash in Area 89 5
    Street/Outside Security 88 6
    Alcohol/Drug Use Outside 72 7
    Juvenile Gangs 70 8
    Street Traffic Flow 64 9
    Congested Streets 46 10
    lnadequate Parking 35 11
    Public Transportation 29 12


    Table 8: Discouraging Factors

    Questions 8 and 9, both open-ended, attempted to pinpoint the most and least attractive elements of the Jahnke Road corridor. Because of their number and diversity, these answers are difficult to categorize and quantify. They have, however, been transcribed verbatim and are provided in the data packet which accompanies the report.

    Top                        


    Improvements and Services Needed

    Question 3 gave survey respondents the chance to choose which services they would like to see in the Jahnke Road corridor. Table 9 below list the goods and services in the order of their popularity. The top five responses were restaurants, a hardware store, a grocery store, a bakery, and a women's clothing store. The five goods or services which were selected the least were financial services, appliances, professional services, furniture store, and medical services.

    Desired Goods and Services

    Goods/Service

    # of Responses

    Rank

    Restaurants

    147

    1

    Hardware Store

    105

    2

    Grocery Store

    95

    3

    Bakery

    94

    4

    Clothing-Women

    80

    5

    Florist

    67

    6

    Shoe Store

    61

    7

    Drug Store

    53

    8

    Barber/Beauty Shop

    51

    9

    Dry Cleaning

    49

    10

    Sporting Goods

    42

    11

    Clothing-Men

    42

    12

    Clothing-Child

    42

    13

    Medical Services

    39

    14

    Furniture Store

    28

    15

    Professional Services

    27

    16

    Appliances

    25

    17

    Financial Service

    21

    18

    Table 9: Desired Goods and Services

    Top                        

    In conjunction with the responses given for Questions 7 and 8, Question 4 allowed survey participants to choose which improvements they deemed most important for the Jahnke Road Corridor. Table 10 below lists the improvements in order of their popularity.

    Improvement

    # of Responses

    Rank

    Public Safety

    140

    1

    Lighting

    96

    2

    Variety of Merchandise

    92

    3

    Quality of Service

    80

    4

    Walkways

    75

    5

    Access

    56

    6

    Advertising

    49

    7

    Prices

    46

    8

    Special Promotions

    36

    9

    Window Displays

    34

    10

    Store Hours

    31

    11

    Store Interiors

    29

    12

    Table 10: Needed Improvements

    The improvement which was declared most important was the need to increase public safety, which got 44 more responses than the number two selection. The remaining responses in the top five in order of popularity were lighting, the variety of merchandise, quality of service, and walkways.

    Top                        


    Activities
    In Question 16, a number of leisure activities which are performed outside the home were listed. Individuals were to chose the three they participate in most, and to order them from 1 for most frequent to 3 for least frequent. Once again, many of the answers did not conform to the format of the question, so all of the responses for each activity were simply totaled. Religious and church related activities and walking were tied for the most popular activity, followed by movies, natural walks, and other activities which were not listed.

    Activity

    # of Responses

    Rank

    Religious 129 1
    Walking 129 2
    Movies 92 3
    Natural Walks 67 4
    Others 52 5
    Swimming 35 6
    Automotive 28 7
    Bicycling 25 8
    Bowling 24 9
    Dancing 22 10
    Water Sports 21 11
    Golf 21 12
    Tennis 18 13
    Baseball 16 14
    Basketball 14 15
    Volleyball 9 16
    Soccer 8 17
    Rink Skating 6 18
    Roller Blading 5 19

    Table 11: Activities Outside of Home

    Top                        

    Question 17 focused on activities which take place at home. Survey participants were given a choice of 11 such activities, and asked to choose their three favorites, ranking them from 1 to 3. The results are furnished below in Table 12. Reading or books was the overwhelming favorite, with 178 responses. Completing the top five are video, cooking/culinary, yard or lawn care, and gardening.

    At Home Activities

    Activity

    # of Responses

    Rank

    Reading/Books

    178

    1

    Video

    99

    2

    Cooking/Culinary

    76

    3

    Lawn/Yard Care

    52

    4

    Gardening

    47

    5

    Computer Related

    46

    6

    Crafts

    41

    7

    Pet Related

    40

    8

    Photography

    24

    9

    Painting/Framing

    19

    10

    Spa/Pool/Hot Tub

    11

    11

    Table 12: At Home Activities

    Question 18 allowed respondents a chance to suggest a recreational activity they would most like to see in the Jahnke Road Corridor. These answers are included in the data packet which accompanies this report. This question prompted a variety of answers too numerous to mention in this report. There were, however, several responses which appeared repeatedly. A fitness facility or gym of some kind appeared several times, as did a skate rink, bowling alley, park, movie theater, and walking trail.

    Top